More on Cancer Testing

January 30, 2014 on 1:58 pm | In General Posts | No Comments

Recently I posted about a new profile we are doing in our office for pets, mainly dogs, as a screening tool for cancer and other inflammatory conditions.

To date, about 96% of dogs are low in blood vitamin D levels, 48% are high in their CRP levels, and 12% are high in their TK levels.

This profile is also quite helpful for pets with cancer to monitor their remissions and alter their treatment regimen based upon changes in the test.

For this discussion, I want to focus on vitamin D levels. The next 2 discussions will focus on the other aspects of testing, the TK and CRP levels.

Vitamin D3 is not simply thought of as a vitamin to protect bones anymore. Instead it has far reaching effects on every cell in the body, regulating metabolism and gene expression. As such, proper levels of Vitamin D 3 can have cancer-protective (and cancer-killing) effects, reduce the chance of infectious diseases such as the flu, and promote good health and proper regulation of other body systems.

Unlike people, pets do not typically make vitamin D from exposure to sunlight and therefore require it in their diets or via supplementation.

While pet food is formulated to have enough vitamin D 3 to prevent vitamin D 3 deficiency disease (rickets,) levels are too low for most pets to maximize health (a goal of holistic doctors.) Testing shows most dogs have blood levels considered insufficient to maximize health and would benefit from supplementation. Low levels of vitamin D have been linked to inflammation, cancer, heart disease, kidney disease, inflammatory bowel disease, and various infectious diseases.

Exactly how much vitamin D 3 an individual patient requires depends upon the size of the pet, the health of the pet, the presence/absence of disease, and most importantly the pet’s blood level of vitamin D 3. Once vitamin D 3 test results are available, supplementation is given with the goal being to shoot for a blood level of 100 mg/ml (in studies pets with cancers tended to have vitamin D 3 blood levels lower than 100.) Additional testing is done to confirm if the prescribed amount of vitamin D 3, typically given once daily with food, is enough to reach the recommended blood level.

Pets with Cancer-Other Medicines OK to Give?

January 10, 2014 on 7:34 am | In General Posts | No Comments

I’m often asked if pets with cancer should continue taking their heartworm and flea medicines. Here’s how I address that situation in my practice, Paws & Claws Animal Hospital.

Unlike conventional doctors who focus on the cancer, holistic doctors focus on the PET…therefore we want to keep the pet healthy while we are also fighting the cancer. I would hate for one of my cancer patients to be cured of cancer only to die of heartworms because we stopped the monthly preventive during cancer treatment…so I always recommend continuing the preventive during the cancer treatment.

However, I rarely prescribe chemical flea medicines for any of my patients. First, these products do not prevent fleas but rather kill them once the flea gets on the pet. At least in my practice fleas are not a big problem so there is no need for regular use of these products. Second, these products, while safe for most pets, are still strong chemicals that last in the pet’s body for a long time. An important part of cancer treatment is detoxification (with herbs, homeopathics, and autosanguis therapy.) I want to avoid unnecessary toxins since cancer itself (and cancer chemo/radiation) are all toxic. There is no need to add extra toxins to my cancer patients unless absolutely necessary (the pet is covered with fleas and ticks.) Since natural flea control, esp in the environment, is safe and non-toxic, I rarely see the need for topical chemicals (my all-in-one and itch relief shampoos plus the natural flea spray are all I typically prescribe for most pets.)

More on Testing Pets for Cancer

January 4, 2014 on 7:53 am | In General Posts | No Comments
I’ve had a number of people write me asking about my recent posts regarding blood testing for pets with cancer and those w/o cancer as a way to allow for early diagnosis. Instead of writing multiple emails I thought I would summarize my responses here.
1.First most veterinarians, in my opinion, are not as progressive on early diagnostics as I am and may not offer the panel of tests to allow early cancer diagnosis or monitor remission of cancer patients.
2.We offer special pricing on various tests to our clients to encourage use of the tests. As a result our panel of tests is cost effective. Other doctors may charge more and this may discourage use of these important tests.
3.While the tests are easy to run interpretation can be challenging, esp for vets not familiar with the science involved. This may discourage them from offering the tests as they are not sure how to interpret findings, esp those in the “grey area.”
4.Unless the doctor has expertise in cancer medicine, specifically integrative cancer medicine, he is unlikely to offer therapies to help correct abnormalities found on testing, making the testing useless.
5.Every holistic doctor has his own favorite therapies. I’ve developed unique proprietary products for my patients that I believe are better than those used by other doctors (otherwise I would use therapies currently on the market.) I believe these are superior therapies based upon the responses I see with my patients and am always improving our treatments and developing new therapies. Your doctor will prescribe whatever therapies he believes best helps your pet.
6.Finally, the “correct dose” of treatment such as Vitamin D supplement depends upon many factors. I can’t give a “recommended dose” without knowing the specifics of each case, including test results. This is why you must have the testing done in order to determine the best dose for your pet (dosing for pets varies based upon test results and other factors; even pets of the same size may need very different doses of supplements to achieve ideal results.)
Hope this helps. And if you can’t find a holistic vet to help, I’m just an email or phone call away!

December Specials for Dr. Shawn’s Natural Pet Products

December 6, 2013 on 11:26 am | In General Posts | No Comments

Just in time for the Christmas holidays, I am happy to offer the following special… Enter the code “20off” at www.drshawnsnaturals.com from Dec 3-Dec 15. Save 20% off of EVERYTHING. Stock up, purchase your holiday gifts, and enjoy!

Merry Christmas from Dr. Shawn’s Naturals

20/20 got it wrong

November 23, 2013 on 9:03 am | In General Posts | No Comments

Last night ABC’s 20/20 aired a segment warning pet owners that some unscrupulous veterinarians might try to “sell” them procedures that are not needed by the pet. Here are my thoughts after viewing this segment.

1.It is true that in every profession, including the medical profession, unscrupulous individuals exist. These doctors simply want to make as much money as possible without regard to the patient’s true medical needs. I’ve been fortunate that I’ve only encountered a few of these folks in my profession (my first boss was one such individual.)

2.The 20/20 segment focused on 2 commonly recommended medical procedures:vaccines and dental cleanings, so I’ll address these issues.

3.The segment discussed how some of the doctors who were secretly videotaped recommended annual vaccinations even though the AVMA (and others) recommend vaccines no more often than every 3 years. The ABC “expert,” Dr. Marty Becker, confirmed that pets only need vaccines every 3 years.

Unfortunately, both the AVMA and the expert are WRONG. Most pets RARELY need vaccines. In my experience using blood titer testing to determine when pets require vaccines, my research and experience has confirmed that the typical pet only needs vaccines a few times in its entire life. Doctors who push vaccines on any sort of a regular basis are not following the science of immunology and are responsible for vaccinating pets that really don’t need these “extra shots.”

4.Regarding dental cleanings, 20/20 presented 2 different dogs to a variety of veterinarians in the New York area to determine if the veterinarians would recommend a dental cleaning. The dogs had supposedly been examined by another “expert” who determined that the dogs did not need a dental cleaning. During the undercover taping, several doctors suggested these dogs would benefit from a professional dental treatment. As a viewer, it’s impossible to accurately judge whether or not the dogs really needed this procedure, but for the sake of argument I’ll agree with 20/20’s “expert” that the dogs did not need dental treatment. Dr. Becker stated that because dental cleanings done under anesthesia can be dangerous, it’s important that only those pets that really need dental cleanings should receive treatment.

WRONG AGAIN!! First, anesthesia is very safe IF it is done correctly using the correct anesthetic for the patient and IF the patient is carefully monitored during the procedure. Our hospital is known for anesthetizing higher risk patients: older dogs and cats with diseases that other doctors are scared to place under anesthesia. There is no increased risk in giving these pets the proper (dental) treatment when the procedure is performed correctly.

Also it’s important to treat pets with dental disease early in the course of their disease BEFORE the infection and pain worsen and the pet begins to lose teeth and suffer from the ill effects of chronic inflammation and infection.

While I appreciate that 20/20 and their “experts” want to warn pet owners that a few vets are bad apples (who is surprised at that??!!,) I don’t want pet owners to ignore serious problems like dental disease or get their pets vaccinated if they don’t need vaccines. Had 20/20 interviewed someone like myself who could intelligently explain the care that pets really need they would have done a greater service to pet owners who want to keep their pets healthy and alive as long as possible without doing unnecessary procedures such as frequent immunizations.

Interesting Stats on Chemotherapy

November 19, 2013 on 5:06 pm | In General Posts | No Comments

An important paper has been published in the Australian journal Clinical Oncology. This meta-analysis, entitled “The Contribution of Cytotoxic Chemotherapy to 5-year Survival in Adult Malignancies” set out to accurately quantify and assess the actual benefit conferred by chemotherapy in the treatment of adults with the commonest types of cancer.

The study concluded that overall, chemotherapy contributes just over 2 percent to improved survival in cancer patients….despite the mounting evidence of chemotherapy’s lack of effectiveness in prolonging survival, oncologists continue to present chemotherapy as a rational and promising approach to cancer treatment.

How is it possible that patients are routinely offered chemotherapy when the benefits to be gained by such an approach are generally so small? In their discussion, the authors address this crucial question and cite the tendency on the part of the medical profession to present the benefits of chemotherapy in statistical terms that, while technically accurate, are seldom clearly understood by patients.

For example, oncologists frequently express the benefits of chemotherapy in terms of what is called “relative risk” rather than giving a straight assessment of the likely impact on overall survival. Relative risk is a statistical means of expressing the benefit of receiving a medical intervention in a way that, while technically accurate, has the effect of making the intervention look considerably more beneficial than it truly is. If receiving a treatment causes a patient’s risk to drop from 4 percent to 2 percent, this can be expressed as a decrease in relative risk of 50 percent. On face value that sounds good. But another, equally valid way of expressing this is to say that it offers a 2 percent reduction in absolute risk, which is less likely to convince patients to take the treatment.

Dr. Shawn says….While I’m not opposed to chemotherapy (or any valid therapy) per se, I think it’s important that the therapy offer at least some potential benefit. For too many human and pet patients, doctors often recommend (“push”) the standard trio of surgery, chemo, and radiation even though they do little to influence the patient’s ultimate outcome or survival. By taking a holistic approach, we are able to carefully evaluate all possible therapies and recommend those most likely to provide substantial benefit.

What Supplements to Use for Pets with Cancer?

November 6, 2013 on 2:10 pm | In General Posts | No Comments

The question of which supplements to use for pets with cancer comes up a lot…..I put all my patients on high dose fish oil, my own Healthy Qi, CI Support, Olive Leaf Plus, and Ten Mushroom formula (supplements I designed based upon my experience and positive response in thousands of patients)…liver and GI support as needed…detoxification for all patients…homeopathic support, autosanguis therapy and stem cells……vitamin D based upon blood testing..freshly ground flax seed….cancer specific therapy as needed (lymphoma formula for lymphomas, HSA formula for hemangiosarcoma, etc…..)

This is a good starting point for all cancer patients, and working with your holistic vet (or via phone consult if you don’t have a local holistic vet) is essential for ongoing care…..


Rogue Cancer Cells

November 5, 2013 on 7:07 pm | In General Posts | No Comments

Recently I’ve had the chance to talk with several people about the concept of “rogue” cancer cells. These are cells that are supposedly left behind in the body after successfully treating the patient. In other words, after all of the cancer has been removed, there exists the possibility of some remaining cells hiding somewhere that somehow were not killed during the cancer treatment.

The conversations I had were with a woman who had been cured of early stage breast cancer and also with a pet owner whose dog had been cured of a mast cell cancer that had been confined to the skin. In both cases the patients’ doctors were recommending followup chemotherapy (and in the woman’s case hormonal therapy.) The patients wanted my thoughts on using further treatment for cancers that had been cured.

First let’s discuss the concept of rogue cancer cells, then we can discuss whether additional treatment might be needed or beneficial.

What’s the likelihood that rogue cancer cells (cells that survived the initial treatment) even remain following “successful” treatment?

Well it really depends upon the type of cancer. For cancers like lymphoma or osteosarcoma, the likelihood that resistant cancer cells have survived treatment is quite high. For other cancers like early stage breast cancer or mast cell cancers confined to the skin, the chance of any cancer cells remaining in the body following treatment is extremely remote. In general, these cancers are usually considered cured once treatment has been completed (however, because the immune system was dysfunctional and allowed cancer cells to develop, I always recommend and prescribe immune support using natural supplements following successful treatment/cure to reduce the chance of future cancers.) Because some cancers are unlikely to have cells that survive treatment, using harsh treatments like chemotherapy or hormone therapies just doesn’t make sense to me from a biological perspective.

However, what if some rogue cell really existed and was hiding in the body? Would chemotherapy do any good? The answer is a definite maybe. Maybe the rogue cancer cell would be killed by chemotherapy (then again, maybe it wouldn’t, especially if chemotherapy had been used as part of the original treatment.) Most people don’t realize that chemotherapy usually doesn’t kill 100% of the cancer cells in most cases, especially in aggressive or advanced cancers. The goal of chemo in these patients is to kill enough (but not all) of the cancer cells so that the patient can be “in remission” for a period of time before the cancer returns. Cancer cells that survive the first round of chemo are less likely to respond (for any length) of time to additional chemo to kill “rogue” cells.

Because of these medical facts, in just about every case using chemo to kill “rogue cells” doesn’t make sense. In most cases no such rogue cells exist, and if they do there is a chance the chemo won’t kill them anyway (although the chemo might kill the patient!)

In general, properly prescribed supplements have a chance of killing rogue cells AND will boost the immune system, which is THE most important thing to do to try to prevent future cancer.

Breast Cancer Awareness Month

October 10, 2013 on 1:22 pm | In General Posts | No Comments

3 years ago, my wife Sandy was diagnosed with breast cancer. She didn’t know what she was going to do, but she did know 2 things: she wanted to be treated as an individual and not as a statistic, and if at all possible she didn’t want chemotherapy.

She and I did a lot of research that led us to develop a program combining both conventional and natural therapies to empower Sandy to beat cancer without using chemotherapy.

As you know, October is Breast Cancer Awareness Month. Breast Cancer is the 2nd leading cause of death in women 35 to 54 years of age!! It affects more than 250,000 American women a year!!

Many of us know or have known a woman affected by this deadly disease! And all women want to reduce their risks of contracting breast cancer.


Obviously, you want the best treatment for your loved ones if they are stricken with cancer! But sometimes the technological advancements and various treatment types can be overwhelming! The solution is simple: empower women to make the best choices for themselves by providing them with the facts they need to know to stay healthy and treat their cancers.

In our book on breast cancer, Breast Choices for the Best Chances: Your Breasts, Your Life, and How You Can Win the Battle!, we discuss…

How a simple vitamin can be a powerful cancer fighter.

Which supplements can help kill cancer.

Why many women with breast cancer do not need and will not benefit from chemotherapy…and how to determine those that will….

New research on what the term “positive lymph node” really means

Why mammograms may miss cancer.

Breast Choices for the Best Chances: Your Breasts, Your Life, and How You Can Win the Battle! will help women understand their individual diagnosis, evaluate their treatment options, and communicate with their doctors about which treatment plan best fits their prognosis. This must-have book, available online at amazon.com, enables women to take a proactive role in the treatment and management of their cancer.


New Supplements Available from Dr. Shawn…and They’re on Special This Month!

October 10, 2013 on 1:16 pm | In General Posts | No Comments

Check the website in October for special sale pricing on my 2 newest formulas.

The first is my Advanced GI Formula, one of my favorite supplements for pets with any type of GI disease. I’ve used this in my practice for many years to successfully help pets with vomiting, diarrhea, GI parasites, cancer support, and IBD. It contains Glutamine, Cat’s Claw, Ginger, Psyllium, Aloe, and Licorice, and works best when combined with Dr. Shawn’s Enzymes and Probiotics.

The second new product is for pets with any type of cancer and is called Advanced Cancer Formula. Ingredients include glutamine, arabinogalactans, kelp, green tea, arginine, vitamins A, C, and E, silymarin, and spirulina, and for best results it should be combined with Healthy Qi and CI Support. These 3 supplements form the basis of my cancer protocol for all of my cancer patients.


You can check out all of my natural therapies at www.drshawnsnaturals.com

Next Page »

Powered by WordPress with Pool theme design by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds. Valid XHTML and CSS. ^Top^